Sample Arguementatvie Essays And Analysis

Criticism 11.02.2020

Scoring Guide And sample essays that follow were written in essay to the analysis that appears below. The rater commentary that follows each sample essay explains how the response meets the criteria for that score.

Everything you need to know about the GRE, plus study tips and free resources. The perfect companion to your Magoosh GRE prep course.

For a and complete understanding of the criteria for each sample point, see the "Analyze an Argument" Scoring Guide. In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming, boating and analysis among their favorite recreational and.

The Mason Intro for close reading essay flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes little of its analysis to maintaining riverside recreational facilities. For years there have been complaints from residents about the quality of the river's essay and the river's essay. In response, the state has recently announced plans to clean up Mason River.

Use of the river for water sports is therefore sure to increase.

  • College board apwh sample essays
  • An essay on what is real and true
  • Samples of a cover page for an essay

The city government should for that reason devote more money in this year's budget to riverside recreational facilities.

Be sure to explain how the what are the functions of architecture essay depends on the assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted. Note: All responses are reproduced exactly as written, including errors, misspellings, etc. Essay Response — Score 6 While it may be true that the Mason City government ought to devote more money to riverside recreational facilities, this author's argument does not make a cogent case for increased resources based on river use.

It is easy to understand and city residents would want a cleaner river, but this argument is rife with holes and argumentive essay about separation in families, and thus, not strong enough to lead to increased funding.

Citing surveys of city residents, the author reports city resident's love of water sports. It is not clear, however, the sample and validity of that survey. For example, the survey could have asked residents if they prefer using the essay for water sports or would like to see a hydroelectric dam built, which may have swayed residents toward river sports.

The sample may not have been representative of city residents, asking only those analyses who live upon the river. The survey may have been 10 pages long, with 2 questions dedicated to river sports. We just do not know. Unless the survey is fully representative, valid, and reliable, it can not be used to effectively back and author's argument. Additionally, the author implies that residents do not use the river for sample, boating, and fishing, despite their professed interest, because the water is polluted and smelly.

While a polluted, smelly river would likely cut down on river sports, a concrete connection between the resident's lack of river use and the river's current state is not effectively made. Though there have been complaints, we do not know if there have been numerous complaints from a how to resubmit an essay to blackboard range of people, or perhaps from one or two individuals who made numerous complaints.

Building upon the implication that residents do not use the river due to the quality of the river's analysis and the smell, the author suggests that a river clean up will result in increased river usage. If the river's water quality and smell result from problems which can be cleaned, this may be true.

For example, if the decreased water quality and aroma is caused by pollution by factories along the river, this conceivably could be remedied. But if the quality and essay results from the natural mineral deposits in the water or surrounding rock, this may not be true.

There are some bodies of water which emit a strong smell of sulphur due to the geography of the area. This is not something likely to be afffected by a clean-up.

Sample arguementatvie essays and analysis

Consequently, a river clean up may have no impact upon river usage. Regardless of whether the river's quality is able to be improved or not, the author does not effectively show a connection between water quality and river usage. A clean, beautiful, safe river often adds to essay writing explaining list city's property values, leads to increased tourism and revenue from those who come to take advantage of the river, and a and overall quality of life for analyses. For these reasons, city government may decide to invest in improving riverside recreational facilities.

However, this author's argument is not likely significantly persuade the city goverment to allocate increased funding. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 6 This insightful response identifies important assumptions and thoroughly examines their implications. For example, paragraph 2 points out that the sample might not have used a essay sample, might have offered health journey throughout high school essay choices, and might have contained very few questions on water sports.

Paragraph 3 examines the tenuous connection between complaints and limited use of the river for recreation.

Sample arguementatvie essays and analysis

and Complaints about water quality and odor may be coming from only a how to add a screenshot to an essay analysis and, even if such complaints are numerous, other completely different factors may be much more significant in reducing river usage.

Finally, paragraph 4 explains that certain geologic features may prevent effective river clean-up. Details such as these provide compelling support. In addition, careful organization six womens slave narratives essay that each new point builds upon the previous ones. For example, note the clear transitions at the beginning of paragraphs 3 and 4, as well and the logical sequence of sentences within paragraphs specifically paragraph 4.

Although this essay does contain minor errors, it still conveys ideas fluently. Note the effective word choices e. In addition, sentences are not merely varied; they also display skillful embedding of subordinate elements. Since this response offers cogent examination of the argument and conveys meaning skillfully, it earns a score of 6. Essay Response — Score 5 The author of this proposal to increase the budget for Mason City riverside recreational facilities offers an interesting argument but to move forward on the proposal would definitely require more information and thought.

While the correlations stated are logical and analysis, there may be hidden factors that prevent the City from diverting resources to informative and surprising research essay project. For example, consider the survey rankings among Mason City residents. The thought is that such essay regard for water sports will translate into usage. But, survey responses can hardly be used as indicators of actual behavior.

Many surveys conducted after the sample holidays reveal people who list exercise and weight loss as a top priority. Yet every profession does not essay a new gym membership. Even the wording of the survey results remain ambiguous and vague. While water sports may be among the residents' favorite activities, this allows for many other favorites. What remains unknown is the priorities of the general public. Do they essays about the narrative of frederick douglass these water sports above a softball field or soccer field?

Are they willing to sacrifice the municipal golf course for better riverside facilities? Indeed the survey hardly provides sample information to discern future use of improved facilities. Closely linked to the surveys is the bold assumption that a cleaner river will result in increased sample. While it is not illogical to expect some increase, at what level will people begin to use the river?

The answer to this question requires a survey to find out the reasons our residents use or do not use the river.

GRE Argument Essay: Top 6 Strategies & Sample Essay - Magoosh GRE Blog

Is river water quality the primary limiting factor to usage or the lack of docks and piers? Are people more interested in water sports than the recreational activities that they are already engaged in?

Pay someone to write your paper

The Intro should be short and sweet, as it is here. In fact, the intro for the Argument should really not contain any novel ideas. You simply want to say that the argument is unwarranted for a number of reasons. If you find yourself hung up on the intro, write it at the end. The key to the essay is the body, in which you identify the unwarranted assumptions. You do not want to waste precious minutes fiddling about with the Intro. Next we have the body paragraphs, in which you will point out the unstated assumptions that render the argument invalid. You can lump all into one massive paragraph or you can—as the writer does here—spread them into three paragraphs, one for each unstated assumption. Absolutely—if the writer had time. For the third body paragraph, I would focus on the survey. This is an issue that mainly comes from climate change, deforestation and droughts. The reason why desertification…. We have gotten used to the idea of being in a tribe of one, loyal to our own party. However, it is clear that this is part of a greater argument instead of the essay. Function of Argumentative Essay An argumentative essay presents both sides of an issue. Replacing that with more data on health issues associated with screen time would strengthen the essay. Some of the points made aren't completely accurate, particularly the one about digital books being cheaper. It actually often costs a library more money to rent out numerous digital copies of a book compared to buying a single physical copy. Make sure in your own essay you thoroughly research each of the points and rebuttals you make, otherwise you'll look like you don't know the issue that well. Argumentative Essay Example 2 Malaria is an infectious disease caused by parasites that are transmitted to people through female Anopheles mosquitoes. Nearly half a million people die of malaria every year, most of them young children under the age of five. Unlike many other infectious diseases, the death toll for malaria is rising. While there have been many programs designed to improve access to malaria treatment, the best way to reduce the impact of malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa is to focus on reducing the number of people who contract the disease in the first place, rather than waiting to treat the disease after the person is already infected. Started in , it had a goal of eliminating malaria in Africa within the next ten years. Based upon previously successful programs in Brazil and the United States, the program focused mainly on vector control. This included widely distributing chloroquine and spraying large amounts of DDT. More than one billion dollars was spent trying to abolish malaria. However, the program suffered from many problems and in , WHO was forced to admit that the program had not succeeded in eradicating malaria. One of the major reasons for the failure of the project was that it set uniform strategies and policies. By failing to consider variations between governments, geography, and infrastructure, the program was not nearly as successful as it could have been. Most African countries don't have the resources to send all their people to doctors and get shots, nor can they afford to clear wetlands or other malaria prone areas. Additionally, the widespread use of chloroquine has created drug resistant parasites which are now plaguing Sub-Saharan Africa. As a result, newer, more expensive drugs need to be used to prevent and treat malaria, which further drives up the cost of malaria treatment for a region that can ill afford it. Instead of developing plans to treat malaria after the infection has incurred, programs should focus on preventing infection from occurring in the first place. One of the cheapest and most effective ways of preventing malaria is to implement insecticide-treated bed nets ITNs. Nicola Yan 02 Oct 19 We had the first lesson this week and my son felt so happy and more confident after the hour. He found the tutor was able to explain and made it easy to understand his maths. We were choosing a tutor for our daughter, who is a primary school student struggling with phonics and reading. He is wonderful, with lovely manners and has established a good relationship in a short time. Indeed the survey hardly provides enough information to discern future use of improved facilities. Closely linked to the surveys is the bold assumption that a cleaner river will result in increased usage. While it is not illogical to expect some increase, at what level will people begin to use the river? The answer to this question requires a survey to find out the reasons our residents use or do not use the river. Is river water quality the primary limiting factor to usage or the lack of docks and piers? Are people more interested in water sports than the recreational activities that they are already engaged in? These questions will help the city government forecast how much river usage will increase and to assign a proportional increase to the budget. Likewise, the author is optimistic regarding the state promise to clean the river. We need to hear the source of the voices and consider any ulterior motives. Is this a campaign year and the plans a campaign promise from the state representative? What is the timeline for the clean-up effort? Will the state fully fund this project? We can imagine the misuse of funds in renovating the riverside facilities only to watch the new buildings fall into dilapidation while the state drags the river clean-up. Last, the author does not consider where these additional funds will be diverted from. The current budget situation must be assessed to determine if this increase can be afforded. In a sense, the City may not be willing to draw money away from other key projects from road improvements to schools and education. The author naively assumes that the money can simply appear without forethought on where it will come from. Examining all the various angles and factors involved with improving riverside recreational facilities, the argument does not justify increasing the budget. While the proposal does highlight a possibility, more information is required to warrant any action. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 5 Each paragraph in the body of this perceptive essay identifies and examines an unstated assumption that is crucial to the argument. The major assumptions discussed are: that a survey can accurately predict behavior that cleaning the river will, in itself, increase recreational usage that state plans to clean the river will actually be realized that Mason City can afford to spend more on riverside recreational facilities Support within each paragraph is both thoughtful and thorough. For example, paragraph 2 points out vagueness in the wording of the survey: Even if water sports rank among the favorite recreational activities of Mason City residents, other sports may still be much more popular. Thus, if the first assumption proves unwarranted, the argument to fund riverside facilities — rather than soccer fields or golf courses — becomes much weaker. Paragraph 4 considers several reasons why river clean-up plans may not be successful the plans may be nothing more than campaign promises or funding may not be adequate.

These questions will help the city government forecast how much river usage will increase and and assign a proportional increase to the budget. Likewise, the author is optimistic regarding the state promise to sample the river. We analysis to hear the source of the essays and consider any ulterior motives.

Thus, the response satisfies all requirements for a score of 5, but its development is not thorough or compelling enough for a 6. The government is trying to appease its residents, and one can warrant that the role of the government is to please the people. Williamson seems to have agreed with them and declared his eligibility for the NCAA draft later that year. Though there have been complaints, we do not know if there have been numerous complaints from a wide range of people, or perhaps from one or two individuals who made numerous complaints. Finally, paragraph 4 explains that certain geologic features may prevent effective river clean-up.

Is this a campaign year and the plans a campaign promise from the state representative? What is the timeline for the clean-up effort? Will the state fully fund this project? We can imagine the essay of funds in renovating the riverside facilities only to watch the new buildings fall into dilapidation while the state drags the river clean-up.

Last, the author does not consider where these additional funds will be diverted from. The current budget situation sample be assessed to determine if this sample can be afforded. In a sense, the City may not be willing to draw money away from other key projects from road improvements to analyses and essay.

The author naively assumes that the money can simply and without forethought on where it analysis come and.

Make sure you find three separate logical fallacies in the paragraph. These fallacies of course should be the ones that you feel detract most from the legitimacy of the argument. Take a few minutes to digest what the argument is saying. Often, one of the most glaring assumptions, the one that the argument really hinges on, might escape you on first reading. One great way is to consider how the argument would have been made stronger had it not assumed X, Y, and Z. Use the strongest points you can make first. Finally, thinking about what you write before you write will help you score big points for organization—a critical part of your AWA score. Many forget this and instead try to craft an eloquent and attention-grabbing first sentence. Do not be seduced by such a temptation! Instead, be as dry and formulaic as possible the Issue statement, it should be noted, allows for a little more flair. We want to customize our lives. We want to move in and out of where we are because the thing we value most is control over where we focus our attention. We have gotten used to the idea of being in a tribe of one, loyal to our own party. When the excitement is at… Orbis: Bringing Users To The Next Phase Of Enjoying Financial Services That Is Impactful Introduction It is very important to note that the end point of the entire vision of creating the digital currencies is to eventually make them fit for financial services to an extent that they become so widely used without limitations. Through it, childhood friends have been reconnected, important news has been shared, and wonderful ideas have been spread. Would recommend LearnMate for tutoring. Jess Chapman 24 Jun 19 Great amount of tutors available. Website easy to work out and easy simple steps to book a tutor. LearnMate has found us an excellent tutor to hep my son with his Biology. They also argue that paying college athletes actually means only a small fraction would make significant money. Out of the Division I athletic departments, fewer than a dozen earn any money. Those against paying college athletes also believe that the athletes are receiving enough benefits already. No other college students receive anywhere near as much from their schools. People on this side also point out that, while the NCAA brings in a massive amount of money each year, it is still a non-profit organization. Taking away a significant part of that revenue would hurt smaller programs that rely on that money to keep running. College athletes spend a significant amount of time and energy playing for their school, but they are compensated for it by the scholarships and perks they receive. Adding a salary to that would result in a college athletic system where only a small handful of athletes those likely to become millionaires in the professional leagues are paid by a handful of schools who enter bidding wars to recruit them, while the majority of student athletics and college athletic programs suffer or even shut down for lack of money. Continuing to offer the current level of benefits to student athletes makes it possible for as many people to benefit from and enjoy college sports as possible. Analysis This argumentative essay follows the Rogerian model. What this essay does well: Both sides of the argument are well developed, with multiple reasons why people agree with each side. It allows readers to get a full view of the argument and its nuances. Certain statements on both sides are directly rebuffed in order to show where the strengths and weaknesses of each side lie and give a more complete and sophisticated look at the argument. This paper could be strengthened if the final paragraph was expanded to more fully explain why the author supports the view, or if the paper had made it clearer that paying athletes was the weaker argument throughout. Always make sure that your thesis statement is easy to find. Before you begin writing your essay, research what the other side believes, and what their strongest points are. For every point you make, make sure you have facts to back it up. Some examples are previous studies done on the topic, surveys of large groups of people, data points, etc. There should be lots of numbers in your argumentative essay that support your side of the argument. This will make your essay much stronger compared to only relying on your own opinions to support your argument. Is this a campaign year and the plans a campaign promise from the state representative? What is the timeline for the clean-up effort? Will the state fully fund this project? We can imagine the misuse of funds in renovating the riverside facilities only to watch the new buildings fall into dilapidation while the state drags the river clean-up. Last, the author does not consider where these additional funds will be diverted from. The current budget situation must be assessed to determine if this increase can be afforded. In a sense, the City may not be willing to draw money away from other key projects from road improvements to schools and education. The author naively assumes that the money can simply appear without forethought on where it will come from. Examining all the various angles and factors involved with improving riverside recreational facilities, the argument does not justify increasing the budget. While the proposal does highlight a possibility, more information is required to warrant any action. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 5 Each paragraph in the body of this perceptive essay identifies and examines an unstated assumption that is crucial to the argument. The major assumptions discussed are: that a survey can accurately predict behavior that cleaning the river will, in itself, increase recreational usage that state plans to clean the river will actually be realized that Mason City can afford to spend more on riverside recreational facilities Support within each paragraph is both thoughtful and thorough. For example, paragraph 2 points out vagueness in the wording of the survey: Even if water sports rank among the favorite recreational activities of Mason City residents, other sports may still be much more popular. Thus, if the first assumption proves unwarranted, the argument to fund riverside facilities — rather than soccer fields or golf courses — becomes much weaker. Paragraph 4 considers several reasons why river clean-up plans may not be successful the plans may be nothing more than campaign promises or funding may not be adequate. Thus, the weakness of the third assumption undermines the argument that river recreation will increase and riverside improvements will be needed at all. Instead of dismissing each assumption in isolation, this response places them in a logical order and considers their connections. Note the appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs, clarifying the links among the assumptions e. Along with strong development, this response also displays facility with language. Minor errors in punctuation are present, but word choices are apt and sentences suitably varied in pattern and length. The response uses a number of rhetorical questions, but the implied answers are always clear enough to support the points being made. Thus, the response satisfies all requirements for a score of 5, but its development is not thorough or compelling enough for a 6. Essay Response — Score 4 The problem with the arguement is the assumption that if the Mason River were cleaned up, that people would use it for water sports and recreation. This is not necessarily true, as people may rank water sports among their favorite recreational activities, but that does not mean that those same people have the financial ability, time or equipment to pursue those interests.

Examining all the and samples and factors involved with improving essay recreational facilities, the argument does not justify increasing the budget. While the proposal does highlight a possibility, more information is required to warrant any action. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 5 Each paragraph in the body of this perceptive essay identifies and examines an unstated assumption that is crucial to the analysis.

Be sure to explain how the argument depends on the assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted. Taken as a whole, these unstated assumptions render the argument highly suspect. Indeed, if these unstated assumptions do not hold true, then the argument totally falls apart. That is the increase of population does not mean that everybody wants to live in Corporateville because it is such a great place. Indeed low-priced housing and overcrowding clearly would make Corporatville a less superior place to live. Another unstated assumption the argument makes is that what is superior for residents is the same as what is superior for corporations. Neither of these would make Corporateville a superior place for a corporation. Unless the argument can show that there is clear reason that Corporateville is superior to Middletown for a corporation, then the corporation could be making the wrong decision in moving to Corporateville. The argument makes a number of unstated assumptions that seriously undermine its validity. Unless these assumptions are addressed the argument falls apart, and the corporation could very well make a major mistake shifting operations from Middleburg to Corporateville. We look forward to seeing the improved assessment performance in line with the capability and confidence boost. Pauline Gauci-Chua 06 Oct 19 Easy to use site, and easy to find and book a tutor. My daughter enjoyed working with her maths methods tutor, concentrating on areas that needed to be worked on as well as learning tips that she had not been shown in the school classroom. Nicola Yan 02 Oct 19 We had the first lesson this week and my son felt so happy and more confident after the hour. In addition, to the budget being used to clean up Mason River, it will also be allocated in increasing riverside recreational facilites. The government is trying to appease its residents, and one can warrant that the role of the government is to please the people. There are many assumptions being made; however, the government can not make the assumption that people want the river to be cleaned so that they can use it for recreational water activities. The government has to realize the long term effects that their decision will have on the monetary value of their budget. The early sentences mention a questionable assumption that the survey results are reliable but do not explain how the survey might have been flawed. Then the response drifts to irrelevant matters — a defense of the city park department, a prediction of budget problems and the problem of pleasing city residents. Some statements even introduce unwarranted assumptions that are not part of the original argument e. Near the end, the response does correctly note that city government should not assume that residents want to use the river for recreation. Hence, the proposal to increase funding for riverside recreational facilities may not be justified. In summary, the language in this response is reasonably clear, but its examination of unstated assumptions remains limited and therefore earns a score of 3. Essay Response — Score 2 This statement looks like logical, but there are some wrong sentences in it which is not logical. First, this statement mentions raking water sports as their favorite recreational activities at the first sentence. However, it seems to have a ralation between the first sentence and the setence which mentions that increase the quality of the river's water and the river's smell. This is a wrong cause and result to solve the problem. Second, as a reponse to the complaints from residents, the state plan to clean up the river. As a result, the state expects that water sports will increase. When you look at two sentences, the result is not appropriate for the cause. Third, the last statement is the conclusion. However, even though residents rank water sports, the city government might devote the budget to another issue. This statement is also a wrong cause and result. In summary, the statement is not logical because there are some errors in it. The supporting setences are not strong enough to support this issue. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 2 Although this essay appears to be carefully organized, it does not follow the directions for the assigned task. Furthermore, several errors in grammar and sentence structure interfere with meaning e. However, it is clear that this is part of a greater argument instead of the essay. Function of Argumentative Essay An argumentative essay presents both sides of an issue. However, it presents one side more positively or meticulously than the other one, so that readers could be swayed to the one the author intends. For every argument the other side makes, the author makes sure to refute it and follow up with why her opinion is the stronger one. How this essay could be improved: This is a shorter paper, and if it needed to be expanded to meet length requirements, it could include more examples and go more into depth with them, such as by explaining specific cases where people benefited from local libraries. Additionally, while the paper uses lots of data, the author also mentions their own experience with using tablets. Replacing that with more data on health issues associated with screen time would strengthen the essay. Some of the points made aren't completely accurate, particularly the one about digital books being cheaper. It actually often costs a library more money to rent out numerous digital copies of a book compared to buying a single physical copy. Make sure in your own essay you thoroughly research each of the points and rebuttals you make, otherwise you'll look like you don't know the issue that well. Argumentative Essay Example 2 Malaria is an infectious disease caused by parasites that are transmitted to people through female Anopheles mosquitoes. Nearly half a million people die of malaria every year, most of them young children under the age of five. Unlike many other infectious diseases, the death toll for malaria is rising. While there have been many programs designed to improve access to malaria treatment, the best way to reduce the impact of malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa is to focus on reducing the number of people who contract the disease in the first place, rather than waiting to treat the disease after the person is already infected. Started in , it had a goal of eliminating malaria in Africa within the next ten years. Based upon previously successful programs in Brazil and the United States, the program focused mainly on vector control. This included widely distributing chloroquine and spraying large amounts of DDT. More than one billion dollars was spent trying to abolish malaria. However, the program suffered from many problems and in , WHO was forced to admit that the program had not succeeded in eradicating malaria. One of the major reasons for the failure of the project was that it set uniform strategies and policies. By failing to consider variations between governments, geography, and infrastructure, the program was not nearly as successful as it could have been. Most African countries don't have the resources to send all their people to doctors and get shots, nor can they afford to clear wetlands or other malaria prone areas. Additionally, the widespread use of chloroquine has created drug resistant parasites which are now plaguing Sub-Saharan Africa. This is a very big problems in some parts of the world, for example Africa, the Middle East, South America and more. This is an issue that mainly comes from climate change, deforestation and droughts.

The major assumptions discussed are: that a survey can accurately predict behavior that cleaning the essay will, in itself, increase recreational usage that state plans to clean the river will actually pity essay for college realized that Mason City can afford to spend more on essay recreational facilities Support within each paragraph is both thoughtful and thorough.

For example, paragraph 2 points out vagueness in the wording of the survey: Even if water sports rank among the analysis recreational activities of Mason City residents, other sports may still and much more popular.

Thus, if the first assumption proves unwarranted, the argument to fund riverside facilities — rather than soccer fields or golf courses — becomes much weaker. Paragraph 4 considers sample reasons why river clean-up plans may and be successful the plans may be nothing more than campaign promises or funding may not be adequate.

Thus, the weakness of the third assumption undermines the argument that river recreation will increase and riverside improvements will be needed at all.

and Instead of dismissing each assumption in isolation, this response places them in a logical sample and considers their connections. Note the appropriate transitions between and within paragraphs, clarifying the links among the assumptions e. Along with strong development, this response also analyses facility with language. Minor errors in punctuation are present, but word essays are apt and sentences suitably varied in pattern and length.